Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 specifies that corporate
shares or partnership interests cannot be “like-kind” with real
estate. Thus, an individual cannot exchange real estate for
shares in a real estate corporation or for interests in a real
estate partnership. So long as most exchanges were made in a
simultaneous swap of one property for another, this limitation was
not significant. Then some years ago, the IRS approved
time-deferred exchanges, making it possible for a property owner
to sell property, deposit the cash with a qualified intermediary and
then have 45 days to identify replacement property and a total of
180 days to acquire title to the property. This considerably
expanded the possibilities of exchanges because replacement property
could come from a third party. However, if the seller could not find
a suitable replacement property within the permitted time, the
benefits of a like-kind exchange would be lost.
The Tenancy-in-Common Solution
To provide a solution to the timing problem, some real estate
firms acquired properties that were net-leased to high-credit
tenants. These properties were owned as tenancies-in-common (TIC).
In a TIC, two or more persons hold “undivided interests” in one or
more properties, each person’s interest being a designated
percentage of the whole. The real estate firms took the position
that a TIC was not an “entity” such as a corporation or partnership
but was merely a group of separate owners holding fractional
interests in property. Thus, when an individual was unable to find
replacement property within the statutory time limit, he or she
could purchase a fractional interest in a TIC property managed by
the real estate firm. A further advantage of the TIC structure is
that the purchaser can acquire a fractional interest with a value
precisely equal to the amount the individual received for the
relinquished property, thus eliminating any taxable “boot.”
(However, if the tenancy-in-common owns more than one structure, the
purchaser must acquire the same percentage interest in all of the
parcels.)
The IRS May Give Advance Rulings
Until recently, the IRS had never offered guidance as to whether
an individual property owner could exchange in or out of a TIC. Now,
in Revenue Procedure 2002-22, the IRS has specified the conditions
under which the IRS will consider requests for private rulings.
Undivided fractional interests in rental real estate will be
considered an interest in real estate itself, rather than an
interest in a business entity, thus permitting tax-deferred
like-kind exchanges to take place. The IRS will not consider
issuing a private ruling, however, unless 15 conditions are
satisfied. The most important of these are as follows:
- Co-owners must hold legal title as tenants-in-common under
local law.
- The number of co-owners cannot exceed 35 (husband and wife
being treated as a single person).
- The TIC cannot file a partnership or corporate tax return or
hold itself out as a business entity.
- Major decisions such as sale, lease, and financing must be
unanimous. For other actions, a majority vote is sufficient.
- Each co-owner must be able to transfer or mortgage his
undivided interest without the approval of anyone else. However,
the program sponsor may be given a right of first offer. In
addition, restrictions on the right to transfer or encumber the
interest by a lender in customary commercial lending practice
are not prohibited.
- All revenues and expenses of the property must be shared
among co-owners in proportion to their interests.
- Co-owner activity must be limited to those customarily
performed in connection with the ownership of passive real
estate. In determining “activity,” all activities of an agent as
well as the co-owner are taken into account.
- The commonly owned property must be subject to a true lease,
with rent reflecting the fair rental value of the property.
- A lender holding a mortgage on the property cannot be
related to any co-owner, sponsor, property manager or tenant.
- Payment for the fractional interest must reflect its fair
market value and cannot depend on projected income or profits.
The conditions specified in the Revenue Procedure make it
probable that only simple TIC structures are likely to be approved.
More sophisticated structures that sometimes are utilized by
promoters, such as master leases and similar arrangements that
produce higher returns for the promoters, may not be eligible for
advance rulings.
Comment: Real property owners considering the purchase of
a fractional interest in a TIC should be careful to determine the
exact amount of fees and other costs involved in the transaction.
Using a like-kind exchange defers but does not eliminate the payment
of taxes, so paying large fees may make the transaction undesirable.